We Americans have fought with our internal revenue code since 1913. But slicing and dicing income, deductions, and a dizzying array of business and personal credits is hardly the only way that Uncle Sam could raise the money he needs to pay for guns and butter. State and local governments also use sales taxes, payroll taxes, property taxes, excise taxes, and âgross receiptsâ taxes to fill their hungry coffers, too.
And then there are the more exotic taxes, the kind that sometimes live only in philosophersâ heads. The nineteenth-century economist Henry George argued that a land-value tax would raise wages, improve land use, and eliminate taxes on economic activity. More recently, economists and politicians have proposed carbon taxes, consumption taxes, and European-style value-added tax alternatives.
Hereâs one you probably never considered. Earlier this month, a Duke University philosophy PhD candidate named Erick Sam took a microscope to the concept of an âendowment tax.â This is a vaguely Marxist tax on âa personâs potential earnings, which can provisionally be thought of as the maximum income a person could earn or could have earned over a given time period.â (Yikes!)
Sam opens his paper by asking how we determine a personâs âabilityâ in the first place. He acknowledges that we donât âinhabit a reality where endowment is readily apparent,â then goes on to consider standardized test scores, genetic capabilities, and educational achievement as proxies for ability. He even mentions one proposal to impose a âprivilege taxâ based on the income your parents earned during your childhood!
Now the fun starts. Sam walks us through the utilitarian considerations of an endowment tax, and how it counters the âsubstitution effectâ that income taxes impose on the desire to work. âDistributive considerations are only instrumentally relevant to this calculus, since different distributions will tend to be correlated with distinct aggregate utilities.â (Well, duh???) He goes on to address the Kaplowvian argument for endowment taxation as the ideal Haigs-Simon income tax, where âincomeâ equals consumption plus all accretions to wealth over a given period of time. (Huh?)
Next, he drags us kicking and screaming through a dense swamp of non-utilitarian considerations. These include Shaviroâs deontological argument for endowment taxation rooted in the theory of luck egalitarianism, Starkâs libertarian challenge to Rawlsian arguments favoring the priority of liberty, Markovitsâ algorithm for balancing endowment taxation with talent slavery, and Dworkinâs auction and insurance scheme for eliminating inequality. (Itâs ok, weâre just as lost as you are.)
After 69 pages, Sam thankfully suggests leaving the whole idea in one of the counterfactual worlds where it might actually work. Here on Earth, though, endowment tax fans face three unpleasant choices: 1) make peace with how it does violence towards liberty, 2) acknowledge that itâs both inefficient and unattractive on its own terms, or 3) accept its problems of âtalent slavery, counterfactual talent slavery, and servitude to objective standards of rationality.â Itâs enough to make our current tax code sound pretty dreamy!
So . . . weâve established that our current tax code may not be the worst way to raise government revenue. But that doesnât mean you have to like how much you pay! So email us when youâre ready for some real-world savings, and we promise to explain them in actual English!
Photo Credit: shutterstock
Donna Bordeaux, CPA with Calculated Moves
Creativity and CPAs donât generally go together. Â Most people think of CPAs as nerdy accountants who canât talk with people. Â Well, itâs time to break that stereotype. Â Lively, friendly, and knowledgeable can be a part of your relationship with your CPA as demonstrated by Donna and Chad Bordeaux. Â They have over 50 years of combined experience as entrepreneurial CPAs. Â Theyâve owned businesses and helped business owners exceed their wildest dreams. Â They have been able to help businesses earn many times more profit than the average business in the same industry and are passionate about helping industries that help families build great memories.
